The prolonged refutation is the most recent try by Beijing to defend its dealing with of the outbreak, because it comes below worldwide scrutiny over its dealing with of the virus and faces mounting requires an unbiased inquiry.
The article launched over the weekend started with a prologue that invoked Abraham Lincoln, the 16th President of the USA.
“As Lincoln mentioned, you possibly can idiot among the folks on a regular basis and idiot all of the folks among the time, however you can not idiot all of the folks on a regular basis,” it mentioned.
It then gave a breakdown of every declare, and cited quite a lot of media stories, scientific research and World Well being Group statements to help its counterarguments.
The article lashed out at claims tying the origin of the virus to China. “Being the primary to report the virus doesn’t imply that Wuhan is its origin. In reality, the origin continues to be not recognized,” it mentioned, echoing some extent that has been repeatedly harassed by Chinese language officers and government-controlled media.
It additionally refuted theories that the virus was created by a lab on the Wuhan Institute of Virology or was leaked from the lab in an accident.
Because the virus spreads the world over, Beijing has come below mounting worldwide criticism for allegedly suppressing very important early details about the outbreak and downplaying its severity.
The article tried to disclaim accusations of China’s preliminary cover-up and delayed launch of details about the virus, providing a timeline to indicate the Chinese language authorities’s obvious “open, clear and accountable” method in offering “well timed data” to the world.
However the article didn’t point out the admission by the Wuhan mayor that his authorities didn’t disclose data on the coronavirus “in a well timed vogue” throughout an interview with CCTV on January 27.
The mayor, Zhou Xianwang, mentioned on the time that below Chinese language legislation on infectious illnesses, the native authorities first wanted to report the outbreak to nationwide well being authorities, after which get approval from the State Council earlier than making an announcement.
The article additionally rejected Western criticism towards Beijing over the case of Li Wenliang, a Wuhan physician who tried to sound the alarm on the outbreak in late December however was reprimanded and silenced by police for “spreading rumors.” He died of the coronavirus in early February after contracting it from a affected person, sparking a nationwide outpouring of grief and anger.
The article mentioned Li was not a “whistleblower,” as he was broadly referred to in Western media. As a substitute, it highlighted the truth that Li was a member of the Chinese language Communist Get together, and had obtained posthumous honors as a “nationwide mannequin healthcare employee in preventing Covid-19” and a “martyr.”
“Labeling Dr. Li Wenliang as an ‘anti-establishment hero’ or ‘awakener’ may be very disrespectful to Dr. Li and his household. It’s purely political manipulation with no sense of decency,” the article mentioned.
To pacify public outrage following Li’s dying, the Chinese language authorities has sought to color Li as a mannequin get together member and physician who devoted his life to the struggle of the coronavirus. It launched a weeks-long investigation into Li’s case, which withdrew the reprimand towards Li and blamed an area police officer for mishandling his case — a end result that drew criticism on Chinese language social media.
The article additionally hit again at criticism that Beijing has been spreading disinformation about Covid-19, saying China is “a sufferer of disinformation” from “US politicians, students and media retailers which might be hostile to China.”