West Bengal Governor Jagdeep Dhankhar Says, Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee Working Police State

Mamata Banerjee Running 'Police State': Bengal Governor Jagdeep Dhankhar

Expression of political beliefs is sought to be managed by the federal government: Jagdeep Dhankhar


West Bengal Governor Jagdeep Dhankhar on Monday mounted a contemporary assault on Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, accusing her of operating a “police state” and saying her “misplaced” stance about constitutional norms displays “authoritarianism” which has no place in a democracy.

Dismissing allegations levelled by Ms Banerjee that the governor was attempting to “usurp powers” and create a “diarchy within the state”, Mr Dhankhar stated the individuals of West Bengal are conscious of who within the state is “usurper and extra-constitutional fountain of energy” and who’s operating the “authorities and syndicates”.

Mr Dhankhar was responding to the chief minister’s 13-page missive despatched to Raj Bhawan on Saturday, through which she accused him of attempting to “usurp powers” amid the COVID-19 disaster and termed his feedback towards her and the state’s ministers as “intimidating and abusive”.

The governor in his four-page letter stated he’s properly conscious of his obligations, limitations, powers and authority and would all the time reside as much as constitutional prescriptions, protecting in thoughts the welfare of the state.

“West Bengal, sadly, is rising as a ”police state” with anybody posting on social media to the distaste of the ruling dispensation, will get a police knock and thereafter!

“Expression of political beliefs is sought to be managed by the federal government. Political victimization is on an incremental trajectory,” Mr Dhankhar stated.

The governor stated on this vital juncture of COVID-19 disaster and “ineffective” dealing with of the scenario by the state authorities, it’s for Ms Banerjee to have a “tryst with actuality” as her “misplaced” stance about constitutional norms displays “authoritarianism” which has no place in a democracy.

“Your misplaced stand, that as elected chief minister with a majority within the legislature you might be impregnably unaccountable and as Governor, I’ve no function, is lamentable.

“This smacks of authoritarianism that has no place in a democracy the place all are accountable. You’ve gotten solely to look to latest historical past and round, how your friends, with a majority, confronted flak of regulation,” he stated.

Referring to Ms Banerjee’s allegation of him attempting to usurp powers, Mr Dhankhar stated the individuals of the state are properly conscious of who’s behaving like an “extra-constitutional fountain of energy”.

“The bitter reality is – Folks within the state solely know solely too properly ”Who within the State is a usurper and extra-Constitutional fountain of energy”! Who runs authorities and syndicates! Who is that this ABCD! An open secret! Absolutely I’m not the one, I can guarantee you that I’m moderately up to date about political affairs,” he stated.

Interesting to Ms Banerjee to go away apart variations and work collectively for the advantage of the individuals of the state, he referred to as for successfully addressing the problems flagged by him because the starting of the pandemic.

“Better maturity, farsightedness and positivity at our finish is a name of those attempting instances,” he stated.

Reacting to Mr Dhankhar’s allegation, the Trinamool Congress and the state authorities refused to connect a lot significance to the statements issued by a “BJP spokesperson”.

“We don”t need to connect a lot significance to what a BJP spokesperson sitting in Raj Bhawan is saying or tweeting regularly.

“Henceforth, we have now determined to not touch upon any of his statements, we don”t connect a lot significance to his politically-motivated statements,” TMC secretary-general and state Parliamentary Affairs Minister Partha Chatterjee stated.

The face-off between the state authorities and the Raj Bhawan had escalated final week with Ms Banerjee accusing Mr Dhankhar of repeatedly interfering within the functioning of the state administration, and the governor asserting {that a} state can’t be ruled as a private fiefdom.

Supply hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *